🇨🇾 #Кипр Основные выводы Доклада MONEYVAL
KEY FINDINGS
There are some elements in the Cypriot AML/CFT regime which are functioning adequately:
1 Cyprus understands the money laundering/terrorist financing risks that it faces to a large extent, albeit understanding of terrorist financing risk is less comprehensive. A number of measures have been deployed to mitigate some of the main risks effectively.
2 There is a good level of domestic co-operation and co-ordination between the competent authorities both on policy issues and at an operational level.
3 The banking sector has become more effective in mitigating risks. This is largely due to the increasingly sound supervisory practices of the Central Bank of Cyprus.
4 The financial intelligence unit has the ability to support the operational needs of competent authorities through its analysis and dissemination functions.
5 Cyprus has developed mechanisms which are capable of delivering constructive and timely assistance to other countries both on a formal and informal basis.
⛔️However, there are various major shortcomings which hinder the effectiveness of the Cypriot AML/CFT regime:
1 The competent authorities are not yet sufficiently pursuing money laundering from criminal proceeds generated outside of Cyprus, which pose the highest threat to the Cypriot financial system.
2 The competent authorities have not been very proactive at freezing and confiscating foreign criminal proceeds at their own initiative, although they have been instrumental in assisting other countries.
3 Cyprus has not conducted a formal assessment of risks posed by legal persons, despite having a developed company formation and administration business. This has reduced the authorities’ ability to implement more targeted mitigating measures to ensure the transparency of legal persons.
4 There are weaknesses in the implementation of preventive measures by the trust and corporate services sector as a whole. This has major implications for the availability of beneficial ownership information of legal persons/arrangements registered in Cyprus and the reporting of suspicions transaction reports.
5 While significant strides have been made by Cyprus to implement a comprehensive supervisory framework for trust and corporate services providers, further progress is required, with certain areas requiring major improvement.
6 The risk in the real estate sector has increased exponentially since it has become the preferred choice of investment vehicle to acquire citizenship under the Cyprus Investment Programme. These risks have not been properly been mitigated – the implementation of preventive measures by, and the supervisory framework of, the sector display significant weaknesses.
7 The risks related to the Cyprus Investment Programme have not been assessed comprehensively.
8 Administrative service providers did not demonstrate a uniform level of understanding of the risks of TFS evasion. Given Cyprus’s status as an international financial centre and the role played by administrative service providers as gatekeepers, the fact that some service providers may not always be in a position to identify individuals or entities who may seek to conceal their identity behind complex structures to evade sanctions constitutes a significant vulnerability. The application of a risk-based approach to the non-profit sector was still at a nascent stage at the time of the on-site visit.
⚠️Priority Actions
1 The competent authorities should be more aggressive in pursuing money laundering from criminal proceeds generated outside of Cyprus.
2 The competent authorities should be more proactive at freezing and confiscating foreign criminal proceeds at their own initiative.
3 Cyprus should conduct a formal and comprehensive assessment of risks posed by legal persons and arrangements.
4 Cyprus should ensure that ASPs take action to enhance their ML/TF risk understanding and apply preventive measures commensurate with the risks, including by providing more guidance, training and feedback.
