M
ТЯРД
вообще очень много
Size: a a a
2020 February 01
M
klod
Хм, основа запусков, для Маска - повтороное дешевое использование. Не просто полететь. Этого не было в 70-х
Было
k
Было
На практике? Давышо
M
На льфа центавре был ролик ?
AS
klod
Хм, основа запусков, для Маска - повтороное дешевое использование. Не просто полететь. Этого не было в 70-х
Было, это ещё в 60 предлагали, просто тогда это нафиг никому не надо было
OG
ТЯРД
Смешно )
AS
На льфа центавре был ролик ?
Нет наверное, у меня была мысль запилить статью мощную про многоразовость, но лень
M
Сейчас кьюриос дроида ролик кину
M
Смешно )
Ну тебя)
AK
Том Мюллер, разработчик раптора про разные двигатели и про то, почему SpaceX не делают ЯРД:
"Using a high-performance low-density propellant is not the answer. So we’ve gotten everything we’re going to get out of chemical propellants.
So we’re looking, actually, at like electric propulsion for the satellites, and we’re talking to people about nuclear-thermal, you know, the NASA centers are working on nuclear; it’s just prohibitively expensive to test because you can’t; it’s not like the 60s, like when you can just let fission products fly out of your rocket into the desert. You’ve now got to scrub it and clean it and capture it, which is super-expensive. I don’t think SpaceX could really afford to develop that rocket ourselves. If NASA ever gets turned on to develop those test stands, we’d probably want to jump in on that. You can just about double the performance of a rocket to Mars compared to a really-good, like a Raptor system, a chemical system, with fission; nuclear fission. Theoretically, fusion may be ten times better, and antimatter maybe a thousand times better, but I think those are certainly not going to happen in my lifetime. Maybe in your lifetimes.
The warp drive is still a long way away. <laughter> So we’re stuck with chemical propellant for quite a while."
"Using a high-performance low-density propellant is not the answer. So we’ve gotten everything we’re going to get out of chemical propellants.
So we’re looking, actually, at like electric propulsion for the satellites, and we’re talking to people about nuclear-thermal, you know, the NASA centers are working on nuclear; it’s just prohibitively expensive to test because you can’t; it’s not like the 60s, like when you can just let fission products fly out of your rocket into the desert. You’ve now got to scrub it and clean it and capture it, which is super-expensive. I don’t think SpaceX could really afford to develop that rocket ourselves. If NASA ever gets turned on to develop those test stands, we’d probably want to jump in on that. You can just about double the performance of a rocket to Mars compared to a really-good, like a Raptor system, a chemical system, with fission; nuclear fission. Theoretically, fusion may be ten times better, and antimatter maybe a thousand times better, but I think those are certainly not going to happen in my lifetime. Maybe in your lifetimes.
The warp drive is still a long way away. <laughter> So we’re stuck with chemical propellant for quite a while."
OG
Том Мюллер, разработчик раптора про разные двигатели и про то, почему SpaceX не делают ЯРД:
"Using a high-performance low-density propellant is not the answer. So we’ve gotten everything we’re going to get out of chemical propellants.
So we’re looking, actually, at like electric propulsion for the satellites, and we’re talking to people about nuclear-thermal, you know, the NASA centers are working on nuclear; it’s just prohibitively expensive to test because you can’t; it’s not like the 60s, like when you can just let fission products fly out of your rocket into the desert. You’ve now got to scrub it and clean it and capture it, which is super-expensive. I don’t think SpaceX could really afford to develop that rocket ourselves. If NASA ever gets turned on to develop those test stands, we’d probably want to jump in on that. You can just about double the performance of a rocket to Mars compared to a really-good, like a Raptor system, a chemical system, with fission; nuclear fission. Theoretically, fusion may be ten times better, and antimatter maybe a thousand times better, but I think those are certainly not going to happen in my lifetime. Maybe in your lifetimes.
The warp drive is still a long way away. <laughter> So we’re stuck with chemical propellant for quite a while."
"Using a high-performance low-density propellant is not the answer. So we’ve gotten everything we’re going to get out of chemical propellants.
So we’re looking, actually, at like electric propulsion for the satellites, and we’re talking to people about nuclear-thermal, you know, the NASA centers are working on nuclear; it’s just prohibitively expensive to test because you can’t; it’s not like the 60s, like when you can just let fission products fly out of your rocket into the desert. You’ve now got to scrub it and clean it and capture it, which is super-expensive. I don’t think SpaceX could really afford to develop that rocket ourselves. If NASA ever gets turned on to develop those test stands, we’d probably want to jump in on that. You can just about double the performance of a rocket to Mars compared to a really-good, like a Raptor system, a chemical system, with fission; nuclear fission. Theoretically, fusion may be ten times better, and antimatter maybe a thousand times better, but I think those are certainly not going to happen in my lifetime. Maybe in your lifetimes.
The warp drive is still a long way away. <laughter> So we’re stuck with chemical propellant for quite a while."
Отличный ответ
AK
Вкратце: "ЯРД очень хорошо, но слишком дорого и сложно и SpaceX в одиночку не потянет. Если NASA начнет что-то такое делать, то мы возможно запрыгнем."
DM
Zalgo text называется
Фу таким быть
AS
Вкратце: "ЯРД очень хорошо, но слишком дорого и сложно и SpaceX в одиночку не потянет. Если NASA начнет что-то такое делать, то мы возможно запрыгнем."
Все правильно
k
M
klod
Быстро и дешево, а не первые
Дешево?
k
Дешево?
дешевые запуски
OG
Вкратце: "ЯРД очень хорошо, но слишком дорого и сложно и SpaceX в одиночку не потянет. Если NASA начнет что-то такое делать, то мы возможно запрыгнем."
Возможно мистер всратый ник как раз занят разработкой ЯРД потому и говорит, что раптор фуфло
M
klod
дешевые запуски
Ну впринципе да