А
please
Size: a a a
2017 November 09
А
ms should me less then 30ms
QH
120..180 ms for me
А
not good
А
for us who live in Russia
QH
wow, Google — 6 ms
А
git server too far from us
А
yes googe is good
5.713 msQH
Bitbucket 137 ms, but it works slower than GitHub :)
А
lol
А
ya its shit
A
Bitbucket 137 ms, but it works slower than GitHub :)
Грит файрволл
DP
Bitbucket 137 ms, but it works slower than GitHub :)
It works slow even when it’s on your local host 😬🤦🏻♂️
2017 November 10
AC
Bitbucket 137 ms, but it works slower than GitHub :)
I’ll disagree with that.
QH
I’ll disagree with that.
Bitbucket is faster?
AC
Much faster, at least for me.
QH
Much faster, at least for me.
Maybe we're trying to compare different characteristics.
I'm talking about web-interface.
I'm talking about web-interface.
AC
Yes we do. I am talking about working with git. Web interface is fine on both platforms.
QH
Web interface is extremely slow in Bitbucket.
DP
Web interface is extremely slow in Bitbucket.
Agree because the bitbucket platform is too huge; it’s a part of Atlassian stack and has too many features and integrations with Jira and other stuffs, it seems like big enterprise platform. Also it has been written on Java 🙂