Oℕ
Переслано от emi
You’d better (fucking) believe it :)
Size: a a a
2021 February 13
Oℕ
Еееее
крутая конфа
AG
надейся и жди!
λ
λ
крутая конфа
Пасиба
2021 February 14
λ
Какой топ у тебя 3?
λ
Тебе похоже цифра 3 нравится
AT
Лучше за спиной хуесосить, Усович всё правильно сказал
+ лучший комментарий
AT
Лучше нет ничего
AT
блин на конфе не был ибо надо было в амстер сгонять
TT
Volodya стал стикером
E
Я могу довольно прямо сказать, когда дегуза канселили выпустили вот эту резолюцию
https://gist.github.com/ChristopherDavenport/e774563572a25ec589b092a0aa60724f
Вот именно спивак её твитил, и по-моему писал
Цитирую
Thus, John has often participated in technical discussions on the Cats Effect project, frequently and vigorously advocating for his viewpoints and opinions on what should be done and how it should be done. John is also active in the cats-effect Gitter channel, often answering questions with a snippet of code explanation in terms of the ZIO framework.
и дальше
Most critically, this has discouraged contributors, damaged the community, led to significant burn-out among multiple maintainers, and stalled nearly all forward design progress on a vital project.
https://gist.github.com/ChristopherDavenport/e774563572a25ec589b092a0aa60724f
Вот именно спивак её твитил, и по-моему писал
Цитирую
Thus, John has often participated in technical discussions on the Cats Effect project, frequently and vigorously advocating for his viewpoints and opinions on what should be done and how it should be done. John is also active in the cats-effect Gitter channel, often answering questions with a snippet of code explanation in terms of the ZIO framework.
и дальше
Most critically, this has discouraged contributors, damaged the community, led to significant burn-out among multiple maintainers, and stalled nearly all forward design progress on a vital project.
Of course, by simple virtue of knowing someone for such a long span of time, a great deal of objectivity and perspective is lost in judging their actions, positively or negatively. In an attempt to adjust for this bias, several third-parties (non-programmers, entirely outside the Scala and even broader tech ecosystems) were consulted. In each case, information was presented as clearly and comprehensively as possible, attempting wherever possible to admit possible bias in the presentation and clarify perspective. Each such individual came back with the same conclusion: John should be banned. In some cases, the judgments were even harsher; "he's a troll", was a common refrain, as was "he's just thriving on the attention". The fact that third parties, having no prior knowledge of the history or individuals involved, came to this kind of unambiguous and blunt conclusion, is very telling. At the least, it speaks to how newcomers to Cats Effect are likely to view John, and how they are likely to view the previously-tolerant actions of its maintainers.
w
Of course, by simple virtue of knowing someone for such a long span of time, a great deal of objectivity and perspective is lost in judging their actions, positively or negatively. In an attempt to adjust for this bias, several third-parties (non-programmers, entirely outside the Scala and even broader tech ecosystems) were consulted. In each case, information was presented as clearly and comprehensively as possible, attempting wherever possible to admit possible bias in the presentation and clarify perspective. Each such individual came back with the same conclusion: John should be banned. In some cases, the judgments were even harsher; "he's a troll", was a common refrain, as was "he's just thriving on the attention". The fact that third parties, having no prior knowledge of the history or individuals involved, came to this kind of unambiguous and blunt conclusion, is very telling. At the least, it speaks to how newcomers to Cats Effect are likely to view John, and how they are likely to view the previously-tolerant actions of its maintainers.
а можно рисунок фотографии скриншота?
