G
Size: a a a
2020 May 27
b
и зарабатываю на жизнь программированием
b
Ты кринж
понятно
А
потому что я 8 лет работаю в области программирования агентовых систем и несколько лет занимаюсь AI-рисерчем
Ты не филолог?
b
Ан
Ты не филолог?
нет
А
нет
Жаль
b
короче, к чему я это рассказывал про интердискурсивность. у меня по сути есть готовая модель, чтобы это все можно было на скейле вычислять
b
ноооо все несколько упирается, внезапно, в крипту
b
потому что есть разные классы ошибок в тексте
b
я выделяю такие типы ошибок:
1. CORRESPONDENCE. This category includes
a very specific set of errors associated with
factual correctness. Correspondence critique
explores to what extent the factual picture
represents the objective reality.
2. COMPLETENESS. This includes both positive and negative critique of the source
text, concerning its completeness, whether
it can or can-not be proved.
3. LOGIC. Fallacies, contradictions, and
incoherences that can be shown to exist within the logical picture of the text.
4. LANGUAGE. Any substantial critique of
written language, including grammatical errors and mistakes, possible
ambiguity of interpretation, and such.
5. SINCERITY. This type is specifically determined to explore all that
goes beyond the structures of critique itself: matters of intent, malice,
and manipulation.
1. CORRESPONDENCE. This category includes
a very specific set of errors associated with
factual correctness. Correspondence critique
explores to what extent the factual picture
represents the objective reality.
2. COMPLETENESS. This includes both positive and negative critique of the source
text, concerning its completeness, whether
it can or can-not be proved.
3. LOGIC. Fallacies, contradictions, and
incoherences that can be shown to exist within the logical picture of the text.
4. LANGUAGE. Any substantial critique of
written language, including grammatical errors and mistakes, possible
ambiguity of interpretation, and such.
5. SINCERITY. This type is specifically determined to explore all that
goes beyond the structures of critique itself: matters of intent, malice,
and manipulation.
b
пять классов ошибок, которые имеют разную природу и которые нужно по-разному обрабатывать от текста к тексту
А
я выделяю такие типы ошибок:
1. CORRESPONDENCE. This category includes
a very specific set of errors associated with
factual correctness. Correspondence critique
explores to what extent the factual picture
represents the objective reality.
2. COMPLETENESS. This includes both positive and negative critique of the source
text, concerning its completeness, whether
it can or can-not be proved.
3. LOGIC. Fallacies, contradictions, and
incoherences that can be shown to exist within the logical picture of the text.
4. LANGUAGE. Any substantial critique of
written language, including grammatical errors and mistakes, possible
ambiguity of interpretation, and such.
5. SINCERITY. This type is specifically determined to explore all that
goes beyond the structures of critique itself: matters of intent, malice,
and manipulation.
1. CORRESPONDENCE. This category includes
a very specific set of errors associated with
factual correctness. Correspondence critique
explores to what extent the factual picture
represents the objective reality.
2. COMPLETENESS. This includes both positive and negative critique of the source
text, concerning its completeness, whether
it can or can-not be proved.
3. LOGIC. Fallacies, contradictions, and
incoherences that can be shown to exist within the logical picture of the text.
4. LANGUAGE. Any substantial critique of
written language, including grammatical errors and mistakes, possible
ambiguity of interpretation, and such.
5. SINCERITY. This type is specifically determined to explore all that
goes beyond the structures of critique itself: matters of intent, malice,
and manipulation.
Интересно
А
Завтра почитаю твой бложик
b
А
Завтра, я уже прибухнуть собрался
b
у меня есть еще aletheia.icu/~badt блог, там я пишу последнее время про Логос, мой язык для описания и вычисления произвольных дискурсов
