> Господи, даже здесь jQuery

тут я умир

> Код на Расте, исполняемый замыканием, может вызывать панику

ЩИТО

This is all a bit of a spicy take, but it's been a long time coming: Lua's C API is absolutely awful and basically nobody uses it safely. Every project I've ever seen (every!) that has used Lua has given their project an avenue to memory unsafety via Lua scripts. Every (every!) Lua bindings system I have ever seen has been memory unsafe. I have spent at this point years thinking about how to protect people from the face of Cthulhu that is the Lua C API, and I've come to the conclusion that it is was... I guess useful but possibly misguided effort.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/biq864/giving_up_on_wlrootsrs/

Всё, переходим на перл?

я всё еще читаю и охуеваю

видимо, поэтому lua JIT отстает на мажор-другой?

LuaJIT, конечно, жалко, но бзпснст важнее

> I know of one "potentially" safe use in production of untrusted Lua scripts, in a commercial entity, and it's my understanding that as part of their solution they had to remove __gc metamethods from the language entirely.

тут я вспомнил крипто-блокчейн стартап, который смарт-контракты хотел делать на lua

так речь про обычный lua, как я понимаю

LuaJIT лучше?

вряд ли

я к тому, что недоумевал, чего джит с обычным так сильно расходятся

Больные ублюдки

If there are patterns that Rust can't express, then I guess we should work at making Rust better, or finding new patterns? If there are fundamental limitations to Rust.. then I guess let's make a new language? I know there are some problems that require advanced knowledge of memory layout and lifetimes and will be unsafe, but Rust's purpose is not to pretend such problems don't exist, Rust's purpose is to provide a firewall against them, to make sure that unsafe code is reasoned about locally, not throughout the entirety of your project, the projects that use your project, their users, and so on. People talk about Rust being restrictive and kind of influencing the design of your whole project, but you could turn this around the other way: C is so unrestrictive that you can express crazy lifetime rules in it, and this sort of sucks everything that uses them into being as memory unsafe as C. This is not limited to Rust, C++, safer non-systems languages also suffer from this effect, as is evident from Lua. I refuse to believe that the solution is that C will live forever, that just can't be the solution.

чот крепко чувака ударило

Этого не может быть, потому что этого не может быть

а я получил еще один ризон не использовать lua, с неожиданной стороны

но автотулс же на перле, зачем от неё избавляться?

Автоген, автоконф или автомейк?

Я что-то не припомню там перла

"их нравы" https://yandex.ru/turbo?text=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.ru%2Fforbeslife%2F386523-dver-nam-otkryla-37-letnyaya-staruha-pochemu-millenialy-okazalis-ne-gotovy-k