Adrian Johnston - Capitalism’s Implants: A Hegelian Theory of Failed Revolutions
Going back to Hegel himself, there is a long-standing tendency to associate dialectics with dynamics. That is to say, Hegel’s dialectical philosophy frequently is construed as an updated, sophisticated need to reconsider this deeply-engrained intellectual habit of equating Heraclitean flux doctrine, a sort of process metaphysics constantly
foregrounding becoming, change, fluidity, movement, transformation, and the like. Indeed, for Marx, Engels, and much of the Marxist tradition, dialectics-as-dynamics is the rational revolutionary kernel of Hegelian thinking. Yet, at least at the level of socio-political philosophizing, the
past two-hundred years since the publication of Hegel’s political magnum opus, Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1821), has made evident the the dialectical with the dynamic. If Hegelianism (as well as Marxism)
is to remain capable of reckoning with history up through the twenty-
first-century present, it must be able to account for why and how so much of the future historical progress Hegel and Marx, as children of the Enlightenment, optimistically anticipated failed to happen. One could say that real social history itself from the nineteenth century
through today has exhibited much in the way of stasis, setbacks, and
regressions unforeseen by the likes of Hegel and Marx themselves. The sorts of socio-historical progress envisioned by Hegelianism and Marxism has for a long time been, and still continues to be, stalled. This fact calls for conceptualizing a dialectics of non-dynamism, a sluggish
or stuck dialectic, so to speak. Herein, I attempt to contribute to this (re) conceptualization of historical dialectics by developing a Hegelian theory of failed revolutions precisely through an immanent-critical engagement with the full span of Hegel’s political writings from 1798 to 1831.
https://crisiscritique.org/volume_8-issue_2/CC_8.2_Adrian%20Johnston.pdf