AC
тогда рынок был в popierdolenom положении
Size: a a a
2020 April 07
AC
в некотором благодаря Майкам конечно
R
Роман это имя, роман это жанр.
DF
Что там? Вкрации
AC
Q: Do you view Linux and the open-source movement as a threat to Microsoft?
A: Yeah. It's good competition. It will force us to be innovative. It will force us to justify the prices and value that we deliver. And that's only healthy. The only thing we have a problem with is when the government funds open-source work. Government funding should be for work that is available to everybody. Open source is not available to commercial companies. The way the license is written, if you use any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software open source. If the government wants to put something in the public domain, it should. Linux is not in the public domain. Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches. That's the way that the license works.
A: Yeah. It's good competition. It will force us to be innovative. It will force us to justify the prices and value that we deliver. And that's only healthy. The only thing we have a problem with is when the government funds open-source work. Government funding should be for work that is available to everybody. Open source is not available to commercial companies. The way the license is written, if you use any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software open source. If the government wants to put something in the public domain, it should. Linux is not in the public domain. Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches. That's the way that the license works.
DF
Кек
DF
Спасибо
A
я думал Ротшильды и Сорос правят Россией
VK
Q: Do you view Linux and the open-source movement as a threat to Microsoft?
A: Yeah. It's good competition. It will force us to be innovative. It will force us to justify the prices and value that we deliver. And that's only healthy. The only thing we have a problem with is when the government funds open-source work. Government funding should be for work that is available to everybody. Open source is not available to commercial companies. The way the license is written, if you use any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software open source. If the government wants to put something in the public domain, it should. Linux is not in the public domain. Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches. That's the way that the license works.
A: Yeah. It's good competition. It will force us to be innovative. It will force us to justify the prices and value that we deliver. And that's only healthy. The only thing we have a problem with is when the government funds open-source work. Government funding should be for work that is available to everybody. Open source is not available to commercial companies. The way the license is written, if you use any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software open source. If the government wants to put something in the public domain, it should. Linux is not in the public domain. Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches. That's the way that the license works.
во всём прав.
VK
с другой стороны, стоило бы повозмущаться, что частным компаниям тоже может перепасть government funding'а
AC
с другой стороны, стоило бы повозмущаться, что частным компаниям тоже может перепасть government funding'а
так уже по другому лицензия работает
λO
Ну так корпорации победили. Ничего крупного кроме линукса под жпл не осталось
A
кoгда сценарий был написан заранее!
ЗП
https://github.com/bmeck/proposal-from-import
ну тут я даже не знаю, называть жсеров тупыми или очень тупыми?)
ну тут я даже не знаю, называть жсеров тупыми или очень тупыми?)
TZ
Какой же у dhall дурацкий синтаксис. Про принцип наименьшего удивления Гонсалез явно не слышал.
Aq
ну, у дхола конечно дурацкий синтаксис (вербозный) но не такой дурацки как концепция "наименьшего удивления"
DF
Кек
VK
Синтаксис вербозный, зато вывод типов не нужен.
Всё направлено на то, чтобы альтернативные реализации было как можно легче плодить.
Всё направлено на то, чтобы альтернативные реализации было как можно легче плодить.
Aq
не дай бох шоб компьютер или разработчик либы поработал лишний раз.
пользователь языка конфигурации - вот кто должен потеть
пользователь языка конфигурации - вот кто должен потеть