Size: a a a

2019 July 18

A

Alexandr in pro.flood
источник

ДЧ

Денис Чиканов in pro.flood
At one time, almost all OSCE countries had criminal defamation and insult laws. Over time, these laws have been repealed, invalidated by courts, or fallen into disuse in many OSCE participating States. Unfortunately, many criminal codes contained multiple articles punishing defamation and insult. Thus, even when parliaments and courts have acted, they have sometimes failed to remove all legal prohibitions against insult or all criminal sanctions for defamation. In communist countries and other anti-democratic regimes, such laws are often used to target political opponents of the government. Today, when insult and criminal defamation laws are used, they are most often used to punish mere criticism of government policies or public officials, to stifle political discussion, and to squelch news and discussion that governments would rather avoid. It is relatively rare for a private individual (someone who is not a public official, elected representative, or person of means and influence) to persuade law enforcement representatives to use the tax money of the public to protect their reputations. In some OSCE countries, such laws are still used to systematically punish political opponents of the regime. Even in countries where these laws have fallen into a long period of disuse, it is not unheard of for an overzealous prosecutor to revive them for seemingly political purposes. The International Context
Numerous non-governmental organizations have taken strong positions against criminal defamation and insult laws. These include Amnesty International; Article 19; the Committee to Protect Journalists; national Helsinki Committees such as the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Croatian Helsinki Committee, Greek Helsinki Committee, Romanian Helsinki Committee and Slovak Helsinki Committee; the International Helsinki Federation; The World Press Freedom Committee; Norwegian Forum for Freedom of Expression; national chapters of PEN; and Reporters Sans Frontières. 
источник

ДЧ

Денис Чиканов in pro.flood
Денис Чиканов
At one time, almost all OSCE countries had criminal defamation and insult laws. Over time, these laws have been repealed, invalidated by courts, or fallen into disuse in many OSCE participating States. Unfortunately, many criminal codes contained multiple articles punishing defamation and insult. Thus, even when parliaments and courts have acted, they have sometimes failed to remove all legal prohibitions against insult or all criminal sanctions for defamation. In communist countries and other anti-democratic regimes, such laws are often used to target political opponents of the government. Today, when insult and criminal defamation laws are used, they are most often used to punish mere criticism of government policies or public officials, to stifle political discussion, and to squelch news and discussion that governments would rather avoid. It is relatively rare for a private individual (someone who is not a public official, elected representative, or person of means and influence) to persuade law enforcement representatives to use the tax money of the public to protect their reputations. In some OSCE countries, such laws are still used to systematically punish political opponents of the regime. Even in countries where these laws have fallen into a long period of disuse, it is not unheard of for an overzealous prosecutor to revive them for seemingly political purposes. The International Context
Numerous non-governmental organizations have taken strong positions against criminal defamation and insult laws. These include Amnesty International; Article 19; the Committee to Protect Journalists; national Helsinki Committees such as the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Croatian Helsinki Committee, Greek Helsinki Committee, Romanian Helsinki Committee and Slovak Helsinki Committee; the International Helsinki Federation; The World Press Freedom Committee; Norwegian Forum for Freedom of Expression; national chapters of PEN; and Reporters Sans Frontières. 
источник

T

Timur in pro.flood
Кстати, забавный факт про Данию: там можно сжигать флаг Дании, но нельзя флаги любого другого государства
источник

T

Timur in pro.flood
Я все, продолжайте
источник

ДЧ

Денис Чиканов in pro.flood
TL;DR - статьи за оскорбление там, где они ещё общались - исторический атавизм, с которым борются
источник

A

Alexandr in pro.flood
Но они есть, и их, вероятно, поборят в отношении власти, но не в отношении личности
источник

A

Alexandr in pro.flood
А, написав что Хутин петух
источник

A

Alexandr in pro.flood
Ты оскорбляешь личность, а не представителя власти
источник

A

Alexandr in pro.flood
И это ненормально
источник

ДЧ

Денис Чиканов in pro.flood
Alexandr
Но они есть, и их, вероятно, поборят в отношении власти, но не в отношении личности
>Ты говоришь, что в цивилизованных странах они есть и это ок
>Я показываю, что даже там, где они ещё есть, с ними борются и называют нецивилизованными
источник

ДЧ

Денис Чиканов in pro.flood
Alexandr
И это ненормально
Мне плевать на твою мораль и религиозные взгляды, повторяю, это моё право
источник

A

Alexandr in pro.flood
Ок, спор окончен, считай, что это твоё право
источник

ДЧ

Денис Чиканов in pro.flood
Кул
источник

VG

Vladislav Golovatyi in pro.flood
Timur
Кстати, забавный факт про Данию: там можно сжигать флаг Дании, но нельзя флаги любого другого государства
а ведь это кому-то когда-то спасло жизнь
источник

VG

Vladislav Golovatyi in pro.flood
источник

VG

Vladislav Golovatyi in pro.flood
источник

T

Timur in pro.flood
Левак - значит куколд, все просто
источник

NK

ID:671739633 in pro.flood
Timur
Левак - значит куколд, все просто
блять ты странный
источник

d

dima in pro.flood
ор
источник