VG
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: ipoe: create vlan bond1.1406 parent bond1
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: ipoe: start interface bond1.1406 (shared=0,mode=L2,ifcfg=1,start=up,start=dhcpv4,ipv6=0,proxy-arp=1,ip-unnumbered=1)
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: bond1.1406:: send [RADIUS(1) Access-Request id=1 <User-Name "1406.0"> <NAS-Port 43> <NAS-Port-Id "bond1.1406"> <NAS-Port-Type Ethernet> <Calling-Station-Id "0a:fc:76:dd:ce:ad"> <Called-Station-Id "bond1.1406"> <Framed-IP-Address 192.168.0.55> <Acct-Session-Id "940af07cc46a4924"> <User-Password 0xf6e70ad8deabba1bb4ecd8c0f7bcb9be>]
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: bond1.1406:: recv [RADIUS(1) Access-Accept id=1 <Framed-IP-Address 192.168.1.100> <Framed-Route "192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.100"> <DHCP-Router-IP-Address 192.168.1.1> <DHCP-Subnet-Mask 255.255.255.0> <Cisco-AVPair "ip:inacl=INTERNET_ACCESS_IN"> <Cisco-AVPair "ip:outacl=INTERNET_ACCESS_OUT"> <Acct-Interim-Interval 600> <Filter-Id "20000/20000">]
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: bond1.1406:1406.0: 1406.0: authentication succeeded
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: bond1.1406:1406.0: send [RADIUS(1) Accounting-Request id=1 <User-Name "1406.0"> <NAS-Port 43> <NAS-Port-Id "bond1.1406"> <NAS-Port-Type Ethernet> <Calling-Station-Id "0a:fc:76:dd:ce:ad"> <Called-Station-Id "bond1.1406"> <Acct-Status-Type Start> <Acct-Authentic RADIUS> <Acct-Session-Id "940af07cc46a4924"> <Acct-Session-Time 0> <Acct-Input-Octets 0> <Acct-Output-Octets 0> <Acct-Input-Packets 0> <Acct-Output-Packets 0> <Acct-Input-Gigawords 0> <Acct-Output-Gigawords 0> <Framed-IP-Address 192.168.0.55>]
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: bond1.1406:1406.0: recv [RADIUS(1) Accounting-Response id=1]
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: bond1.1406:1406.0: shaper: installed shaper 20000/20000 (Kbit)
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: bond1.1406:1406.0: pppd_compat: ip-pre-up started (pid 17543)
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: bond1.1406:1406.0: pppd_compat: ip-pre-up finished (0)
May 18 10:56:58 BNG01 accel-ipoe: bond1.1406:1406.0: ipoe: session started
как насчет отвечать радиусом access-reject на такой случай?
