Any good blockchain developer urgent help needed DM me

Dm

Dm

Hi,
We are looking for a Web3 developer to create the frontend of a DeFi / gaming dApp using HTML, CSS and REACT (or an alternative JavaScript-based framework), backend server components using Node.js (experience of deploying to Heroku or alternative Cloud application platform highly desired).
Working with our Solidity developer, you will use Web3 technologies (Ethers.js preferred) to integrate the front- and back-ends you create with our existing and future Smart Contracts, deployed on the Polygon blockchain.

Currently we're not able to pay a substantial wage and we are a pre launch start up company.
We will employ you as a contractor and do full rugdoc-like KYC to owners.
Once we launch we will pay our developers in cryptocurrency and this payment will increase depending on our profit levels and levels of individual involvement.

Please contact me if you are interested in joining our team.

hello
Can you show your deployed Polygon contract addresses?
Who are your Owners?
Many good blockchain developers are free people and do not want to be enslaved by the owners.

By the way, I don't trust RugDoc auditor and the like, because honest people said me that those auditors anonymously confirm fake documents of anonymous Russian greedy admins of hard-core ponzi vfat listed projects https://vfat.tools/polygon/

I talked with one of the admins of such projects (yield farming) in public telegram channel of his layered ponzi project. He turned out to be an anonymous, greedy, fearful young man and the absolute dilettante in real crypto management. For exmaple, he was simply losing money of "investors" (about $500k Deposits Fee from their about $12m "deposits") while bootstrapping liquidity and taking further important steps. Most of those "investor"'s money simply flowed into wallets of experienced dex traders and dex trading bots for whom people like him are victims. But he pass all available RugDoc Audits and Certifications)

It was painful for me to watch him lose investor's money with the rate of $250k per day. Some of these people turned out to be good, kind and honest, but gullible to such "audits" and deposited their last money to his new ponzi layer. When they realized that theoretically they could not recoup their losses in any way in degen yield farming by "MasterChef trusting strategy", they simply fixed losses and went to look for other corners in the blockchain world..
All I could do for them was to advise them to maintain their dignity and not beg the admin to return their money, because that would not change anything.

Maybe this sad story will help someone here to improve crypto financial literacy.

Thank you for sharing

In my opinion (simple blockchain engineer), if many new blockchain projects now has an owner, contract subordinates and users, then i can call they as a centrally controlled three-rank networks developed to enrich their owners. I don't like such projects. I know that many people just call it Business and they are ok with it.
Most of all I like true peer-to-peer networks like Bitcoin ("Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" as written in its white paper). In such networks, all users and holders are equal. Now their consensus mechanism is very outdated, it is not ecological, slow and simple compared to modern PoS validation and newer algorithms, but i like core idea of one rank protocol.
It seems to me that nowadays it is possible to build good self-developing peer-to-peer DAO with second layer of developers in EVM network.
If someone is interested in such ideas, has github profile, experience in DeFi protocols developing, and can help then DM me.

Hey

Are you a dev

Yes

Can you remove burn function from the code I don't want it

Also if I put burn fee to 0 will there be any sort of reduction in the total supply when doing transections especially when the total supply is fixed

Because what I can do is just put 0 in the burn fee or remove burn function from the code

from which code?
just make token non burnable
I also do not see the economic sense in burnability. It's just that if a token is burnable, then it can be called deflationary (if its not mintable), I like the way it sounds only.